* Allow founders to transfer territories
* Log territory transfers in new AuditLog table
* Add territory transfer notifications
* Use polymorphic AuditEvent table
* Add setting for territory transfer notifications
* Add push notification
* Rename label from user to stacker
* More space between cancel and confirm button
* Remove AuditEvent table
The audit table is not necessary for territory transfers and only adds complexity and unrelated discussion to this PR.
Thinking about a future-proof schema for territory transfers and how/what to audit at the same time made my head spin.
Some thoughts I had:
1. Maybe using polymorphism for an audit log / audit events is not a good idea
Using polymorphism as is currently used in the code base (user wallets) means that every generic event must map to exactly one specialized event.
Is this a good requirement/assumption? It already didn't work well for naive auditing of territory transfers since we want events to be indexable by user (no array column) so every event needs to point to a single user but a territory transfer involves multiple users.
This made me wonder: Do we even need a table? Maybe the audit log for a user can be implemented using a view? This would also mean no data denormalization.
2. What to audit and how and why?
Most actions are already tracked in some way by necessity: zaps, items, mutes, payments, ...
In that case: what is the benefit of tracking these things individually in a separate table?
Denormalize simply for convenience or performance? Why no view (see previous point)? Use case needs to be more clearly defined before speccing out a schema.
* Fix territory transfer notification id conflict
* Use include instead of two separate queries
* Drop territory transfer setting
* Remove trigger usage
* Prevent transfers to yourself
keyan
Keyan
ekzyis
JP Melanson